Why Mark Zuckerberg’s Oversight Board May Kill His Political Ad Policy – WIRED

Why Mark Zuckerberg’s Oversight Board May Kill His Political Ad Policy – WIRED

Mark Zuckerberg
He sent a brief description to Sandberg, who urged him to write up a proposal. When Zuckerberg saw it, he summoned Feldman to a meeting. “Unbeknownst to me, he had been thinking for a long time about devolution of power away from Facebook, ” Feldman says.
Zuckerberg ultimately hired Feldman as a consultant, and the project was put in motion.“Mark had been seeking input from a lot of different places, ” says Andy O’Connell, a director on Facebook’s Global Public Policy team. “Noah’s idea was actually implementable, and other ideas were not. And it was the most detailed proposal.” (Still, many in and out of Facebook claim to have thought of it. .


”I can’t tell you how many people have said, ‘Glad you’re running with my idea, ” says Zoe Darmé, a manager on the project.)By the spring of 2018, Zuckerberg was sharing his excitement about the idea with people. In an April interview that year, he told me about brainstorming a Supreme Court–like entity, whose members don’t work for Facebook but would have binding authority.
“I think [it] would help make people feel like the process was more impartial on judging what content should be on the service and what’s not, ” he told me.Leading the project were two relative newcomers to Facebook, Brent Harris and Heather Moore. Facebook had hired Harris, an expert in international regulation, to become its director of governance and global affairs late in 2017. Since he had worked on adjudicating the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, he was well-placed to deal with the gushers of offensive content on Facebook’s platform. .

Leave a Reply

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *